Discover more from Truth Summit
A Personal Taking Stock on 9/11 - Andrew Johnson and Richard Gage.
So important to take stock. But this isn’t a pause, a time out. The next step is already happening, already in motion, starting this week: the Truth Tellers Club.
But for a moment, I’m taking stock on what I have learned about 9/11 over the past few months. Why that particular focus? Because there is no single issue on which I have recently learned more.
I’ve never paid a lot of attention to 9/11, maybe because I’m not in the States. I heard about Building 7 a number of years ago - a 47-storey building, part of the same complex as the Twin Towers. It stopped existing a few hours after they did, though no airplane hit it. No media attention. I was shocked when I learned about this. Disbelief. It wasn’t possible. But the evidence was there. The friend who gave me the info had a video of Building 7 disappearing on his cell phone. He played it for me several times.
For me, that there was a Building 7 that stopped existing and that there was media silence, was proof positive that the mainstream story was not to be trusted. Not a surprise. But I was more interested in so many other things than what happened on 9/11.
Then, a few months ago, I came across a presentation by Richard Gage. Evidence, on 10 different points, that the airplanes and the fires could not have caused what happened. Also evidence, on the same 10 points, that controlled demolition could have done it. I contacted Richard Gage and soon interviewed him. A pleasure. Then I sent out about the interview to about 6000 people.
One person wrote back with the suggestion to look into the work of Dr Judy Wood. He also let me know that he had stopped speaking about her findings because he had received death threats.
I took his suggestion, searched, came across presentations on 9/11 by Dr Judy Wood, plus interviews with her and Andrew Johnson. I wrote to them both, got an answer from Andrew, interviewed him. What I heard was very different from the fact-claims presented by Richard Gage. No, it wasn’t the airplanes and subsequent fires. Richard had the facts right about that. But also controlled demolition could not account for what happened - which was not a collapse, but “dustification” (Dr Wood’s term). To really look into the claims, I am now reading Judy Wood’s meticulously researched and detailed book, Where Did the Towers Go? I recommend it.
Judy Wood’s evidence, on the seismic data, on the non-damage to the basin, on the speed of the supposed collapse, and on much else including the data provided by photographs and videos regarding the “dustification” (turning into dust) of the buildings demonstrates that it was something other than controlled demolition. As her sub-title states, there is Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11.
There was a panel after the Truth Summit. Both Andrew and Richard were there, with their utterly different fact-claims. One of the panelists, Elana Freeland, suggested that perhaps there had been, as Richard claimed, bombs involved, while what happened was caused by the process described by Andrew. The so-called elite, she said, always had more than one plan.
Afterwards I wrote to Richard. He had talked, in his interview, about becoming increasingly unleashed over the past few years - for example, recognizing the truth about the c-virus. I wanted to encourage him to see there might be unleashing that had not yet been done. I wondered if he might take a closer look at Judy Wood’s book. I ended by mentioning a play I’ve seen:
I’m remembering a powerful play I saw in London. Half-life. About someone whose legacy is his well-known books on his theory about Stonehenge. Now at the end of his career, it has been discovered that the theory is wrong. He knows that now his books will be at most a footnote, cited as an invalid speculation. The play has this man grappling with this, with a long-time friend who tries to reassure him. But he knows the truth and must come to terms with his having lived, as he terms it, a half-life.
I have not received an answer.
I am grateful I heard of Richard Gage, interviewed him and sent out about the interview. Without that, I would never have heard about Judy Wood’s findings.
I am grateful to Judy Wood for her extremely detailed meticulous research, including on - what comes to mind just now - the jumpers. I am grateful that she held out to have the book published as it is, not cut, as one publisher wanted.
I am grateful to Andrew Johnson for his own extensive truth sleuthing that led him to the same conclusions as Dr Wood, his long friendship with and support of Judy Wood, his being open to being interviewed, and his own two books on 9/11.
I wonder: what does Richard Gage know? Does he know he does not have the full facts about 9/11? If so, what is that like for him? And if he has not let in Judy Wood’s information (he has read her book, he said) but has dismissed it, how has that happened? I think of the many people who dismiss facts about the plandemic.
I’m still not interested in the Twin Towers. I am interested in what Judy Wood found, and what Andrew Johnson also powerfully showed, citing Dr Wood’s findings. Again, as Judy Wood’s sub-title states, it is Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology.
That is very interesting to me. Very important for all of us, I would say. This technology could be used for good, to make irrelevant anything to do with energy shortages.
Instead the technology is evidently held by a cohort utterly uninterested in doing anything of the kind - the cohort behind the massive push toward the elimination of natural life, its replacement by synthetic biology. I am just watching Celeste Solum’s series on that.
What’s my personal taking stock about 9/11? I have travelled, over the past few months, an enormous distance - from believing, without doing any exploring, it had to do with nasty forces using conventional means, to learning the most popular alternative explanation, to further learning that the popular alternative explanation is a red herring, and that there is convincing evidence of something utterly not within conventional technology.
The evidence fits with everything else I’ve been learning about the cohort behind the plandemic and so much else. Much power, technological and other, all used for evil.
One hope I have is that the interview with Andrew brings greater widespread awareness of the free-energy technology and also more knowledge about the predator cohort. One step leads to another. Reiner Fuellmich and his team have now also interviewed Andrew.
Sun Tzu, in The Art of War, long ago wrote that if you know the enemy and yourself, you will win.
When I take stock of what I have learned about 9/11, a core thing is what I have learned about the enemy, and have been able to share with you.
In case you haven’t seen it, here is the panel held after the Truth Summit:
Posted July 3, 2023