

Discover more from Elsa - Thought Creativity Passion Life
Someone accused me of trying to discredit Richard Gage. I WAS trying to find out what the truth was, about what happened on 9/11. If we all have knowing the truth as our goal, it isn’t a matter of discrediting someone if that person’s hypothesis doesn’t fit the facts. Yes, the hypothesis is shown to be invalid. But if the person is truth-centered, that person is not discredited. It’s a matter of looking at as many facts as we can get.
Here’s what I see: using a word, discredit, to try to turn something good, something to celebrate - finding the truth - as something bad, “Nasty, nasty, you’re discrediting.”
I remember a play I saw in London decades ago. I thought about it a long time, and it still lingers in my mind. The play: Half-life. Two old friends are talking. One man, long applauded for his theory about the founding of Stonehenge, has had his theory disproven. He recognizes that instead of his work living on long after him, it will be at most a footnote. He’s at the end of his career. He has no legacy. He is deeply disappointed.
It can be hard to be proven wrong. Painful.
But it isn’t a matter of discrediting a person - unless the person has known he is blocking awareness of the truth. That wasn’t the case in Half-life. The man had dedicated his life to what he believed was the truth.
I have left so many beliefs behind, when I found they did not fit with the facts. Sometimes I have shifted my beliefs a number of times. At other times I have found I did not have enough evidence to be sure of reality, one way or the other.
The person who claimed I was trying to discredit Richard Gage concluded with:
Israel and their American sayanim were guilty of crines against humanity for their participation in the 9/11 controlled demolitions abd cover-up.
He gave no facts, no basis for this belief.
My sense: this is someone not likely to be able to face facts. Much easier for him to dismiss facts as signs of vile “discrediting,” to dismiss fact-people as sayanim (whoever that is).
The truth is something solid. Having a primary commitment to truth means you have a primary commitment to something solid.
By the way, for the truth, detail by detail, about 9/11, here are 3 one-hour videos:
Truth. I’ve already posted on the first. Here are all 3:
https://rumble.com/v2xds92-911-ufo-false-flags-and-freie-energie-teil-1.html
https://rumble.com/v2xpes6-911-ufo-false-flags-and-free-energy-part-2.html
https://rumble.com/v2xwx78-911-ufo-false-flags-and-free-energy-part-3.html
Posted July 13, 2023
What's in a word? Discredit. Someone accused me of trying to discredit.
I want to thank you for bringing the truth about 9/11 to my awareness. I knew it wasn't the planes and that it was planned but the directed energy weapons were new to me. I did not realise that our enemy was so advanced in their weaponry. It is scary but better to know the truth than to live with a lie. Telling the truth is a radical act these days as is being an organic human being. Keep being you Elsa and know that you are appreciated by those who are able to see the truth about the war that is being waged against humanity. With enough courageous people we can create the world we want with Nature and organic biology at it's core. With love and compassion and connection. Thank you for the work that you are doing. (-:
I admire your calm logic in the face of such rudeness. Your point is right on.