Controlled opposition. No one is immune from suspicion. Not Robert Malone, not Reiner Fuellmich. And then suddenly, about Reiner Fuellmich . . . !
Controlled opposition. Allegations fly right and left. Distrust. Sometimes, knowledge. I listened to a video that considered it likely that basically everyone prominent in the fight for the truth about the shots, for freedom from mandates was controlled opposition. Just about every doctor and lawyer.
No one is immune from being viewed with suspicion. Not Robert Malone, not Reiner Fuellmich.
Very recently I heard from Robert Malone on the way he is being charged with being controlled opposition, despite the fact that he has gone from applauded to reviled by the mainstream for being outspoken for truth.
Here in Canada, that’s a big fear about the new leader of the Conservatives, Pierre Pollievre, though he wrote his thesis on freedom (and won a $10,000 prize), and though he has been elected 7 times in his riding. I’m listened to him, including his acceptance as leader of the Conservatives. He sounds great. The main reason for the fear: one of the 2 deputies he has selected. She is connected (so I’ve heard many times) with WEF and, further, among other things she is for a guaranteed income. Also, suspicion about Pollievre has been linked to the way he frequently touches his glasses. This is, I have heard, one of the secret signs of one of the very nasty elite groups.
Trump, I have often heard, is controlled opposition. Or at the very least his hands are dirty. (The latter seems very believable to me.) I’ve heard that maybe he did not use a legal option presented to him at the last minute - I believe it was by Sidney Powell and Michael Flynn - because he had agreed to be pushed out of office. Anyway, by currently putting on the huge rallies, he both shows the support he has and perhaps keeps people focussing more on 2024 than on what can be done now. 2024 - way too late! Of course the rallies can also be seen as giving people more energy to go on.
To the best of my knowledge, every person who has fought to prove election fraud has been viewed as controlled opposition by other people fighting to prove that election fraud changed the results and gave Biden the supposed victory.
And then, yesterday, into my inbox came an allegation, not that Reiner Fuellmich is controlled opposition, but that he has absconded with over one million dollars. Did he do that? Suspicion. Distrust.
I am giving the links to 2 videos - one of the allegation, and the second of his response, his rebuttal. I am sending the information his way, as the video I got presents the information very differently. I’ll come to that.
THE ALLEGATION FROM VIVIANE FISCHER:
https://odysee.com/@FwapUK:1/Viviane-Fischer-alleges-Reiner-Fuellmich-of-absconding-with-%E2%82%AC1.35-million.-:a
THE REBUTTAL FROM REINER FUELLMICH:
https://odysee.com/@BackToTheLight:7/reiner-fuellmich-responds-to-%E2%82%AC1.35-million-theft-allegation-from-corona-committee-mediarebell:b
The way I got the message initially, from Hugo Talks, reads No Surprise - Reiner Fuellmich accused of stealing 1.35 million from Corona Committee. Well, I was surprised. Why were Fischer’s allegations supposed to arouse no surprise? I found the headline predisposed me to accept the allegations - especially nasty as I went on to listen to Fuellmich’s detailed point-by-point rebuttal and his damning portrait of Fischer’s utter incompetence (and much worse). So I searched until I found the information with different headlines. These are the videos I have sent. (The same videos.)
Anyway, not only are there suspicions of controlled opposition, there are serious problems with the people supposedly for truth and justice - in the case of Fischer seemingly with serious psychological problems (but see for yourself).
One other thing. Quite different, yet related. Many on the side of truth and justice are reluctant to speak out when they see wrongdoing from major figures supposedly (or partly) on our side.
I remember watching the allegations of wrong-doing from a former star Rebel News reporter, Lauren Southern. Over and over it was the same kind of wrong-doing. She witnessed well-known figures on the truth side throw vulnerable assistants under the bus with false accusations when they were caught out in a dishonesty or worse, so that the well-known figure could appear untarnished.
Her initial response was to protect the well-known figures by not speaking out. She did not want to do damage to our side. This response lasted for years. But eventually she knew it mattered to tell the truth. In the video I saw, she chronicled, meticulously, at least half a dozen such occurrences - including major amounts of donated money that “disappeared”, and the destruction of the career and the breakdown of someone falsely accused.
So, controlled opposition. Also, some false and some reality-based accusations of wrong-doing against people supposedly for truth and justice by other people (on the surface, anyway) on the side of truth and justice.
How to deal with all this?
Case by case, is one thought. Trying not to get enmeshed. But open to seeing.
Is there controlled opposition? I am sure there is.
There are also lots of questions. Who is controlled opposition? And who are the people sowing these fears, either deliberately, malevolently - or people on our side with deep-rooted fears and distrust, sometimes unable to distinguish between valid and fears without a basis in reality.
And then there are false and real accusations of wrong-doing.
What do we do? We recognize there is danger. We recognize there is some controlled opposition. We recognize also that there are people in agreement with us on many issues who disagree on, for example, how best to detect and substantiate election fraud, and which election fraud to go after. We may also recognize that sometimes we don’t know who is right on this. We recognize we have our own fears, including that supposed friends are actually mainly foes - and we do what we can to lessen irrational fears while keeping awareness of actual dangers. We devote most of our energy to seeing and doing what we can.
That’s the best I can do for now.
I am bringing up the topic of controlled opposition. I don’t know the full answer. Suggestions welcome.
Posted September 27, 2022
Calling your opponent a "slob" when you're in defense mode is never a good look. His general look is harder than I remember.
I haven't kept up with this group because it always seemed like they were more interested in talking about taking action than actually taking it.
Funny how a person's demeanor completely changes when they're in the hot seat. He looks to me like a different person from the one I observed a couple years ago.