I’ve said, my favorite kind of information is GAME-CHANGERS.
For most people, their least favorite, their taboo, kind of information is GAME-CHANGERS.
Look at all the people who REFUSE TO LOOK AT information on the dangers associated with the injections, LET AONE TO BELIEVE any of the information.
Inner structures would crash - for instance, beliefs about the government, like, “I trust that, basically, the government cares about me. Why would they do something they know is harmful.” (Note: this belief is often held rigidly by people, who in their next breath say that all politicians are crooks. In other words, it’s not well thought through.)
I recognize, by the way, that I’ve certainly had my own “INNER HISSY FITS,” as I call them. In other words, I might or might not say anything, but inside me, I had a hissy fit when someone said something I disagreed with. I remember such inner hissy fits especially around climate information. It took me a long time to get through the hissy fit layer - which finally happened through seeing a video which gave me facts I did not have.
I also had inner hissy fits blocking learning that the World Trade Centres did not collapse due to airplanes crashing into them. Finally, talking with someone with a major engineering background, I came to believe that he could possibly know something that proved the mainstream narrative was untrue, which got me to seek out further information, instead of dismissing it.
And you? What about your own blocks? Do you recognize any?
And then, despite my recognizing my own inner hissy fits, GAME-CHANGERS are my favorite kind of information. They always have been. Stimulating, fun, a breath of fresh air. I feel I stand taller and can see further, each time I take in a game-changer.
Most recently it happened around PUTIN. The mainstream has been portraying him as a demon. So my natural response, given the mainstream’s penchant for disseminating untruths, was to see him as a non-demon - basically non-evil. And then I watched a trustworthy source, Jamie Glazov, interviewing 2 sources I could see, from their responses, were also trustworthy, John O’Neill and Sarah C. Wynne on their deeply researched work on Putin: The Assassin - an exploration of the “suicide” deaths of Russian dissidents and oligarchs. You can find the interview here:
https://jamieglazov.com/2022/09/13/glazov-gang-putin-in-bed-with-the-deep-state/
My sense: I now have a much more solid basis for an understanding of Putin.
My question to you: what’s your response to potential game-changers?
Another question: how do you respond to people who block out potential game-changers, like people with induced brain-comas on anything to do with the dangers of the injections?
Final question: can you remember important game-changers in your life?
Posted September 16, 2022
The easiest way to get someone to reconsider their views of 9/11 is to bring up the subject of Building 7. Then show them the clip of the BBC reporter saying the building had come down when it still stands in the background behind her.